The Florida Horsemen’s Association has recently reversed its position on a controversial bill, House Bill 105, which would allow Gulfstream Park to decouple its horse racing and slot machine licenses. Initially supporting the bill, the association has now voiced strong opposition due to concerns over its potential impact on horse racing in Florida. Here’s a breakdown of what’s happening and why this change in stance is significant for the future of racing in the state.
What is the Decoupling Bill?
The decoupling bill, HB 105, seeks to separate Gulfstream Park’s gaming license from the requirement to conduct live horse racing. This bill, if passed, would allow Gulfstream to continue operating its slot machines and other forms of gaming without having to run live horse races. Supporters of the bill, including Gulfstream’s owner, The Stronach Group, argue that this change would allow for more flexibility and financial growth for the park.
Florida Horsemen’s Reversal on the Decoupling Bill
Initially, the Florida Horsemen’s Association, which represents trainers and owners at Gulfstream, supported the decoupling bill. They were assured by 1/ST Racing, Gulfstream’s racing subsidiary, that live racing would continue for at least three more years, along with additional support for workers and aftercare for thoroughbred horses. However, after further discussions, the association has changed its position. They now oppose the bill due to concerns that the future of thoroughbred racing in South Florida is uncertain without a solid plan in place.
The Impact on Florida’s Horse Racing Industry
The Florida Horsemen’s Association is not alone in opposing the decoupling bill. Many other groups within the horse racing industry, including national and regional horsemen’s associations, have voiced their concerns. They argue that if the bill passes, it could seriously harm the future of horse racing in Florida. The industry fears that decoupling could lead to a decline in live racing, with some tracks potentially shutting down. Without a plan to ensure the sustainability of racing, the decision to decouple could have long-term negative effects.
What Happens Next?
The Florida House is scheduled to discuss the bill in a committee hearing on Wednesday at 12:30 p.m. EST. With the Florida Horsemen’s Association now opposing the bill, and several other industry groups raising concerns, it’s unclear whether HB 105 will pass. The Horsemen’s Association has called for meetings with Gulfstream and 1/ST Racing to work on finding a solution that would protect the future of thoroughbred racing in Florida.
The Florida Horsemen’s Association’s shift in stance highlights the growing concerns over the potential effects of decoupling in the state’s horse racing industry. While some see the bill as a chance for growth and flexibility, others fear it could spell the end of live racing at Gulfstream Park. The coming days will be crucial as discussions continue and the Florida House evaluates the bill. The future of thoroughbred racing in Florida may depend on finding a sustainable solution that benefits all involved.
Visit Home